heureka's answer is a good one....how might we arrive at that????
We note that:
tan(41) = h/x and that tan(48) = h/(140-x) where "x" is the horizontal distance from the side of the bridge where the 41 degree angle of depression is observed to the point where the perpendicular line representing the height intersects the bridge and "h" is the height.
Using the second equation, we can write h = (140-x)tan(48) and substituting this into the first equation for h, we have
tan(41) = (140-x)tan(48)/x multiply both sides by x
xtan(41) = (140-x)tan(48) simplifying the right, we have
xtan(41) = 140tan(48) - xian(48) add xtan(48) to both sides
xtan(41) + xtan(48) = 140tan(48) simplify the left side
x [tan(41) + tan(48)] = 140tan(48) divide both sides by [tan(41) + tan(48)]
x = 140tan(48) / [tan(41) + tan(48)]
And using the frist equation, we can write
h = xtan(41)
And substituting in for "x" we have
h = 140tan(48) / [tan(41) + tan(48)] tan(41) =
[tan(48)tan(41)] / [tan(41) + tan(48)] * 140 = about 68.2669m or 68.27m or just 68.3m (rounded to nearest tenth)......which is pretty much what heureka found!!!
Here's a picture to demonstrate the situation: